AMD’s new Ryzen XT lineup comes as an update designed to handle the new Intel Comet Lake processors. The XT offers three new flags to take over the family: Ryzen 9 3900XT, Ryzen 7 3800XT, and Ryzen 5 3600XT, which will all compete for a spot on our list of the best CPUs. Surprisingly, on the surface, the XT configuration is much the same as we’ve seen from Intel in the past: a repetitive set of chips with slight differences from their predecessors in terms of features and clock speeds, not to mention the same number of cores To do, and the intensity of the same knot / process (although it was with some improvements), and the exact same construction as its predecessors.
AMD has also removed the bundled cooler from two of its three new models, which is inconsistent with the standard value proposition to throw all accessories with each chip. Overall, the Raizen XT series does not have an explosive advantage as we are used to with the gene-on-gene correction of AMD, but the XT story has a lot more nuance than what we see on the spec sheet.
A quick glance at the specs reveals that most of the key specifications have not changed, the most fundamental change being that the 12-core 3900XT comes with a higher 100MHz boost, with the eight-core Ryzen 7 achieving 3800X 200MHz, And the 6-core Ryzen 5 3600XT is achieving 100MHz.
Looking at the improvements made to the 7nm node, AMD says that it has improved the boost frequency by 2-4%, but it has also improved the height of the boost or how long the processor stays at the boost frequency, 80 % till. In combination with a slowly increasing clock speed, AMD states that an increased tunnel improves light threaded performance by 4-5%.
As we will cover below, the slight increase to increase the frequencies in the particular sheet we see does not take into account that processors now have more room to increase medium-threaded workloads (they Which do not completely saturate the entire core). This capability provides 10% more performance in some workloads, but we found it quite rare. AMD left this additional performance unchanged leaving the main power restrictions unchanged, meaning you get more performance at the same maximum power shell.
We are seeing some gains in gaming performance, even if not of the explosive type. AMD says that you can expect a 2% improvement with the 3900XT and a 4-5% improvement with the 3800XT depending on the title. But we did not see any big increase. As expected, games that respond to light performance benefit the most, so the benefits may be scattered.
AMD suggests that these processors are not considered a direct upgrade path from the current Ryzen 3000 processor. Instead, existing chips will still be available at retail outlets. The new XT-branded chips will be another option for customers if they are upgrading to a Ryzen processor for the first time, or updating an older device.
You will need to bring a 280 mm (or more) AIO liquid cooler for the Ryzen XT 9 and 7 chipsets, however, which increases the price considerably. We performed slightly better than the automatic plock overclocking feature on previous generation models, but AMD also says that it should not expect manual overclocking frequencies compared to newer chips.
Overall, the Ryzen XT processors increase performance in games that don’t deserve direct upgrades, and most gamers are better suited with current AMD models or competing Intel chips – the Ryzen XT series doesn’t change the gaming scene too much. If gaming is your primary focus, you will be presented with a better Ryzen option, such as the Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 5 3600X. The Core i5-10600K is another powerful option that drives our list of the best CPUs.
If you often use non-exclusive productivity applications, given the performance characteristics of the XT model, this is a good step over the standard model. The Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT, in particular, offer significant benefits in some productivity apps such as Photoshop and Adobe Premiere, so paying a little extra for the chip only makes sense when you actually use an aftermarket cooler. Plans to do and use those types. Applications are almost exclusively.
Ryzen XT processors come with a familiar share of brands – the nickname “XT” from AMD’s Radeon Technology Group (RTG). AMD brought the XT brand into their CPUs to indicate that they are higher-performance update chips than their X-series counterparts. This works well for the company from a “ co-branding ” approach, and we may see more XP brand chips. Even in the future. AMD says that it has not added the 16-core 32-thread Ryzen 9 “XT” Ryzen 9 to the stack because it already has a performance crown on mainstream desktops.
Given the volatile pricing we see with current AMD chips, the new XT models will likely sell at a lower price than MSRP, worsening the competitive landscape. Currently, the Ryzen XT 9, 7 and 5 processors are compatible with Intel Core i9, i7 and i5 chipsets, specifically KF models that come without XT chipsets, without integrated graphics.
AMD has not optimized the main frequencies as the company says processors rarely run in these lower frequency ranges, even during highly threaded workloads that fully emphasize the processor and trip power rulers . This is a reasonable argument, and unlike Intel, AMD simply does not specify the Ryden 3000’s TDP benchmark on the base frequency, so the core frequency specification is not as important.
XT processors follow the same 105W and 95W TDP ratings as their predecessors, but most importantly, they have the same PPT (power trace package) variable that defines the upper limit for the power delivered to the socket . This means that the Ryzen 9 and 7 models can tie needles at 142 watts of maximum power draw,